<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Brand of Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mvryan.org/2010/06/the-brand-of-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mvryan.org/2010/06/the-brand-of-me/</link>
	<description>Tidbits about cars, auto racing, music, motocross, football, video games, investing, corporate America, politics...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mvryan.org/2010/06/the-brand-of-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvryan.org/?p=882#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2814&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Tad&lt;/a&gt; 
Good point.  Although, even without proof I would have guessed that Mike&#039;s personal brand would be stronger; he&#039;s done a pretty good job I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2814" rel="nofollow">@Tad</a><br />
Good point.  Although, even without proof I would have guessed that Mike&#8217;s personal brand would be stronger; he&#8217;s done a pretty good job I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad</title>
		<link>http://www.mvryan.org/2010/06/the-brand-of-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mvryan.org/?p=882#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  Perhaps you shouldn&#039;t even try to build your brand around &quot;matt ryan,&quot; because the name is too common and not unique to you.  Look at what Mike Moore has done.  Michael Moore the filmmaker pretty much owns &quot;mike moore&quot;, but check out this search: http://www.google.com/search?q=blowmage

I think Mike has built his personal &quot;blowmage&quot; brand pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  Perhaps you shouldn&#8217;t even try to build your brand around &#8220;matt ryan,&#8221; because the name is too common and not unique to you.  Look at what Mike Moore has done.  Michael Moore the filmmaker pretty much owns &#8220;mike moore&#8221;, but check out this search: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=blowmage" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.google.com/search?q=blowmage&amp;referer=');">http://www.google.com/search?q=blowmage</a></p>
<p>I think Mike has built his personal &#8220;blowmage&#8221; brand pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

